Dear Reader,
The votes are counted. And whoever you voted for… one thing about your retirement didn’t change.
It’s still counted in dollars.
Two days after the vote, Wall Street showed how fast those dollars can vanish.
On November 5, the Dow dropped more than 1,800 points. The S&P 500 fell 4.4%, its worst day since April 2025, according to CNBC.
If your 401k tracks the S&P 500, you lost about that much in a single day.
But that’s the fast way to lose money. The slow way is worse.
In 1971, Nixon made YOUR money officially backed by nothing.
Since then, the dollar has lost 87.9% of its buying power, according to the Labor Department’s own CPI data.
No ballot can change that… because the people who manage the dollar aren’t on one.
That’s why I built a three-phase system that settles how much to hold before deciding what to buy… and moves a portion of your assets onto rails where you keep the keys.
I walk you through it in a free presentation.
See how to election-proof your retirement here →
To your wealth,
Tan Gera, CFA
Decentralized Masters
P.S. On November 5, all 11 sectors of the S&P 500 fell, and losing stocks outnumbered winners almost 6 to 1 on the New York Stock Exchange. Days like that show how little of your retirement you actually control. See how to hold part of your wealth where you keep the keys →
FSLR Earns More While Selling Less. That Tells You Everything.
Revenue fell. Profit rose. That combination usually signals a business in trouble. At First Solar, it signals something different: a manufacturer extracting more value from every watt it ships, right as trade policy raises the floor under import pricing.
First Solar reported Q3 2026 earnings of $5.30 per share, beating the Zacks consensus of $4.64 by 14.2%, even as net sales fell 23% year over year to $1.23 billion. Operating margin hit 44.4%, up 15.1 percentage points from the same period last year. The company did less volume and made more money doing it. That is the cadmium-telluride business model in one line.
Full-year 2026 net sales guidance was cut to $4.60 to $4.90 billion from the prior $4.90 to $5.20 billion. Volume sold guidance was trimmed to 16.0 to 17.0 gigawatts, down from 17.0 to 18.2 gigawatts. Wall Street duly punished the stock. Shares were down about 5% in early pre-market trading on October 30, 2026 after the report. But the guidance cut has a specific source that most of the sell-off ignored.
In its Q3 materials, the company said contracting discipline and Section 232 uncertainty moderated booking volumes. First Solar is not necessarily losing orders to cheaper rivals. It is holding back signings because the Section 232 regime that takes effect December 4, 2026 is set to reset the pricing floor for imported polysilicon products, including certain solar inputs. The August 2026 presidential proclamation set minimum import prices that include $0.38 per watt for solar modules and also imposed an additional 15% ad valorem duty on specified polysilicon ingots and derivatives, effective December 4, 2026.
First Solar is the world’s largest thin film PV solar module manufacturer and the largest PV solar module manufacturer in the Western Hemisphere, and its cadmium-telluride panels do not rely on crystalline silicon supply chains. That means the same rules that pressure many import-dependent competitors can protect its pricing. BMO has said the new floor could push U.S. module prices toward $0.43 to $0.44 per watt. Any contract signed after that pricing shift lands at better economics for First Solar than anything booked today.
The separate risk is one the bulls tend to skip over. First Solar’s 2026 outlook assumes $2.07 to $2.19 billion of Section 45X tax credits. Gross profit guidance is $2.4 to $2.6 billion. At the midpoint, those credits represent roughly 85% of guided gross profit. Strip out the subsidy and the underlying margin picture looks narrower. That is the question the December 4 tariff and minimum import price date cannot answer on its own.
The tension between domestic manufacturing investment and subsidy dependence is not unique to solar. Ford’s billion-dollar Louisville commitment shows how trade policy pressure forces capital allocation decisions that look strong on the surface but leave underlying exposure intact.
First Solar is completing its sixth U.S. manufacturing facility, located in South Carolina, to onshore final production processes for modules initiated by its international fleet. In its Q3 filing, the company said phase one of the South Carolina facility commenced commercial production in September 2026, and it expects phase two to commence operations in mid-2027. For Q4 2026, management guided to module sales of 4.3 to 5.3 gigawatts, including 3.4 to 4.3 gigawatts from U.S. manufacturing operations. The South Carolina facility shifts that domestic mix higher into 2027.
Washington’s push to onshore production is reshaping capital allocation across American industry, not just solar. Domestic steel producers face a similar dynamic where a headline-grabbing manufacturing announcement obscures the years-long gap before new supply actually changes competitive economics.
CEO Mark Widmar described Section 232 as a structural change in how the United States approaches solar manufacturing. He is the CEO of the company that benefits most from that change, so the framing deserves scrutiny. What it does correctly identify is that the competitive floor under First Solar’s pricing is now more regulatory than cyclical. Traders watching the stock near $200 are really watching whether the post-December contract pipeline confirms that pricing power, or whether slower bookings persist into a quarter where the policy cover finally arrives.
